🔗 Share this article

It has been described as a major scams of its type in the United Kingdom.

In all 14 people have been sentenced for their involvement in a multi-million pound plot to cheat over 3,500 holiday ownership investors.

The targets were desperate to get out of long-standing timeshare contracts and sought out support.

The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. More than 500 of them surrendered over £10,000, and one paid more than £80,000.

Those targeted were subjected to high-pressure consultations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing valueless fake "credits" and continued to be bound by high-priced timeshare contracts they could no longer use.

The Firm Behind the Scam

The firm at the heart of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took clients' cash to support the proprietors' luxurious lifestyle of private schools, luxury homes and exclusive air travel.

The leader at the top of the organization, the main defendant, was given a seven and a half year jail time in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his spouse another individual was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She received a two-year suspended prison term at Southwark Crown Court after pleading guilty to financial crime.

This has been a long time coming and represents a significant success for the individuals who testified, the law enforcement and the Crown.

How the Inquiry Began

The first knowledge of the company came in the summer of 2016. The position was in the investigations unit of a broadcasting service, creating documentary programmes.

A colleague mentioned that his mum had inherited the use of a holiday property in Spain and, after years of holidays, had commenced searching to get out of the deal.

It is important to recall how widespread holiday ownership had become with UK travelers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Vacation properties allowed individuals to use the equivalent unit each season, or trade their vacation periods with other owners who had units in alternative destinations. About 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that option.

The initial boom was linked to a many stories about unscrupulous sellers deceptively promoting investments. They were regularly featured on investigative TV programmes.

The standard holiday ownership agreement tied investors in for many years.

At that time, those investors who had enjoyed their regular accommodation in the sun for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a significant number were looking to end their association to their vacation investments.

Some had health issues and found it difficult to access their apartments. Some just thought they'd achieved their goals from them. And a portion had deceased, in frequent situations leaving their heirs to assume the agreements - including their annual payments and upkeep costs.

The Undercover Operation Progresses

And that's where the friend's mum had been placed. She looked online for options and found the company, a business whose digital platform claimed to release her from her contract.

But, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her loved ones had doubts.

Subsequent checking showed numerous individuals saying they had submitted funds and got nothing out of it. Actually, they had lost money. Substantial amounts.

The reporting group began investigating what was going on. It soon emerged that there were some shady characters operating in the vacation property industry.

One lawyer had numerous client reports preparing to take action against SMT.

The team interviewed clients who had used the firm and they all told the same story. They believed the company would purchase their timeshare off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were told there was no market for their property.

Instead, they were persuaded - actually compelled - to spend more money purchasing "the firm's incentive scheme", associated with the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.

The precise definition was not exactly clear. They sounded like a kind of currency, providing cheaper vacations and amenities and retail offers.

And they were apparently "transferable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Investing money immediately would result in an long-term benefit that would pay for SMT's fees and leave the timeshare holder ahead financially, released finally from their troublesome agreement.

Too good to be true? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Scam'

If these accounts were correct, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - specifically the company - "baits" the customer by advertising a specific service only to then say that's not available, directing the customer in the direction of another, inferior offering.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the testimony we had collected, we made the case to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.

The process requires commitment, energy, and clear arguments for why this is the only way to gather the evidence necessary to demonstrate illegal activity.

With approval secured, our small team set up a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the English town.

Posing as a potential client hoping to help his mother free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement